Wednesday 22 June 2016

SURVEYING: ERROR SOURCES IN TOTAL STATION

SURVEYING: ERROR SOURCES IN TOTAL STATION

Total Station Error Sources

All theodolites measure angles with some degree of imperfection. These imperfections result from the fact that no mechanical device can be manufactured with zero error. In the past very specific measuring techniques were taught and employed by surveyors to compensate for minor mechanical imperfections in theodolites. With the advent of electronic theodolites, the mechanical errors still exist but are related to in a different way. One must now do more than memorize techniques that compensate for errors. One must clearly understand the concepts behind the techniques and the adjustments for errors that electronic theodolites now make. The following paragraphs provide the major sources of error when using a theodolite and also the particular method employed to compensate for that error.

a) Circle eccentricity

Circle eccentricity exists when the theoretical center of the mechanical axis of the theodolite does not coincide exactly with the center of the measuring circle. The amount of error corresponds to the degree of eccentricity and the part of the circle being read. When represented graphically circle eccentricity appears as a sine wave. Circle eccentricity in the horizontal circle can always be compensated for by measuring in both faces (opposite sides of the circle) and using the mean as a result. Vertical circle eccentricity cannot be compensated for in this manner since the circle moves with the telescope. More sophisticated techniques are required.
(1) Some theodolites are individually tested to determine the sine curve for the circle error in that particular instrument. Then a correction factor is stored in ROM that adds or subtracts from each angle reading so that a corrected measurement is displayed.
(2) Other instruments employ an angle-measuring system consisting of rotating glass circles that make a complete revolution for every angle measurement. These are scanned by fixed and moving light sensors. The glass circles are divided into equally spaced intervals which are diametrically scanned by the sensors. The amount of time it takes to input a reading into the processor is equal to one interval, thus only every alternate graduation is scanned. As a result, measurements are made and averaged for each circle measurement. This eliminates scale graduation and circle eccentricity error.

b) Horizontal collimation error

Horizontal collimation error exists when the optical axis of the theodolite is not exactly perpendicular to the telescope axis. To test for horizontal collimation error, point to a target in face one then point back to the same target in face two; the difference in horizontal circle readings should be 180 degrees. Horizontal collimation error can always be corrected for by meaning the face one and face two pointings of the instrument.
(1) Most electronic theodolites have a method to provide a field adjustment for horizontal collimation error. Again, the manual for each instrument provides detailed instruction on the use of this correction.
(2) In some instruments, the correction stored for horizontal collimation error can affect only measurements on one side of the circle at a time. Therefore when the telescope is passed through zenith (the other side of the circle is being read), the horizontal circle reading will change by twice the collimation error. These instruments are functioning exactly as designed when this happens.
(3) When prolonging a line with an electronic theodolite, the instrument operator should either turn a 180-degree angle or plunge the telescope and turn the horizontal tangent so that the horizontal circle reading is the same as it was before plunging the telescope.

c) Height of standards error:

In order for the telescope to plunge through a truly vertical plane the telescope axis must be perpendicular to the standing axis. As stated before there is no such thing as perfection in the physical world. All theodolites have a certain degree of error caused by imperfect positioning of the telescope axis. Generally, determination of this error should be accomplished by a qualified technician because horizontal collimation and height of standards errors interrelate and can magnify or offset one another. Horizontal collimation error is usually eliminated before checking for height of standards. Height of standards error is checked by pointing to a scale the same zenith angle above a 90-degree zenith in "face-one" and "face-two." The scales should read the same in face one as in face two.

d) Circle graduation error

In the past, circle graduation error was considered a major problem. For precise measurements surveyors advanced their circle on each successive set of angles so that circle graduation errors were “meaned out.” Current technology eliminates the problem of graduation errors. This is accomplished by photo-etching the graduations onto the glass circles and making a precise master circle and photographing it. An emulsion is then applied to the circle and a photo-reduced image of the master is projected onto the circle. The emulsion is removed and the glass circle has been etched with very precise graduations.

e) Vertical circle error

It is important to check the vertical circle indexing adjustment on surveying instruments on a routine basis. When direct and indirect zenith angles are measured to the same point, the sum of the two angles should equal 360°. Over time, the sum of these two angles may diverge from 360° and consequently cause errors in vertical angle measurements. While averaging the direct and indirect zenith angles easily eliminates this error, on many jobs it may not be cost effective to make two readings. Acceptable accuracy may still be maintained for many applications with only a direct reading; however, as long as the index error is kept to a minimum by periodically performing a vertical adjustment, such as TOPCON’s "Vertical Angle 0 Datum Adjustment." Most total stations are provided with some type of electronic adjustment to correct the vertical circle indexing error. This adjustment takes just a few seconds and will insure that you get good vertical angle readings with just one measurement. Consult the manufacturer’s manual for instructions on making this adjustment.

f) Pointing errors:

Pointing errors are due to both human ability to point the instrument and environmental conditions limiting clear vision of the observed target. The best way to minimize pointing errors is to repeat the observation several times and use the average as the result.

g) Uneven heating of the instrument.

Direct sunlight can heat one side of the instrument enough to cause small errors. For the highest accuracy, utilize an umbrella or pick a shaded spot for the instrument.

h) Vibrations

Avoid instrument locations that vibrate. Vibrations can cause the compensator to be unstable.

i) Collimation errors

When sighting points a single time (e.g., direct position only) for elevations, check the instrument regularly for collimation errors.

j) Vertical angles and elevations

When using total stations to measure precise elevations, the adjustment of the electronic tilt sensor and the reticule of the telescope becomes very important. An easy way to check the adjustment of these components is to set a baseline. A line close to the office with a  large difference in elevation will provide the best results. The baseline should be as long as the longest distance that will be measured to determine elevations with intermediate points at 100- to 200-ft intervals. Precise elevations of the points along the baseline should be measured by differential leveling. Set up the total station at one end of the baseline and measure the elevation of each point. Comparing the two sets of elevations provides a check on the accuracy and adjustment of the instrument. Accuracy requirements may dictate that more than one set of angles and distances is measured to each point. Some examples are distances over 600 feet, adverse weather conditions, and steep observations.

k) Atmospheric corrections

Meteorological data corrections to observed EDM slope distances may be significant over longer distances. Usually for most topographic surveying over short distances, nominal (estimated) temperature and pressure data is acceptable for input into the data collector. Instruments used to measure atmospheric temperature and pressure must be periodically calibrated. This would include psychrometers and barometers.

l) Optical plummet errors

The optical plummet or tribrachs must be periodically checked for misalignment. This would include total stations with laser plummets.

m) Adjustment of prism poles

When using prism poles, precautions should be taken to ensure accurate measurements. A common problem encountered when using prism poles is the adjustment of the leveling bubble. Bubbles can be examined by establishing a check station under a doorway in the office. First, mark a point on the top of the doorway. Using a plumb bob, establish a point under the point on the doorway. If possible, use a center punch to make a dent or hole in both the upper and lower marks. The prism pole can now be placed into the check station and easily adjusted.

n) Recording errors

The two most common errors are reading an angle incorrectly and/or entering incorrect information into the field book. Another common (and potentially disastrous) error is an incorrect instrument or rod height. Although electronic data collection has all but eliminated these errors, it is still possible for the surveyor to identify an object incorrectly, make a shot to the wrong spot, or input a bad target height (HR) or HI. For example, if the surveyor normally shoots a fire hydrant at the ground level, but for some reason shoots it on top of the operating nut, erroneous contours would result if the program recognized the fire hydrant as a ground shot and was not notified of this change in field procedure.

o) Angles

As a rule, a surveyor will turn a doubled angle for move-ahead, traverse points, property corners, or other objects that require greater accuracy. On the other hand, single angles are all that are required for topographic shots. Refer to the total station operating instructions for repeating angle methods where required.

p) Slope to grid and sea level EDM corrections

Slope distances will be reduced to horizontal distances in the data collector, and then reduced to a grid distance if a grid scale factor (or combined scale sea level factor) is input into the data collector. For most topographic survey applications involving short side shots, the grid scale factor is ignored (e.g., 1.000 is used). This would not be correct for control traverses covering larger distances. Scale factors can be obtained directly in CORPSCON.

q) EDM calibration


All EDM instruments should be periodically (at least annually) checked over a NGS Calibration Baseline or a baseline established by local state surveying societies.

RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY METHODS FOR HIGHWAY ROUTE SELECTION

RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY METHODS FOR HIGHWAY ROUTE SELECTION
Reconnaissance survey is done to examine the general character of the area for the purpose of determining the most feasible route or routes for further more detailed investigations.
Data collected from reconnaissance survey is used for feasibility study of all different routes, preparation of approximate estimates of quantities and costs. This helps in selection of most suitable alternatives. This survey also helps in determining any deviations required in the basic geometric standards to be adopted for the highway facility.
Reconnaissance survey is generally not required for the work consisting of improvements to existing roads unless bypass roads are involved.
Reconnaissance Survey Methods:
The reconnaissance survey methods may be conducted in the following sequence:
a) Study of topographical survey sheets, agricultural, soil, geological and meteorological maps and aerial photography.
b) Aerial photography wherever necessary and feasible, and
c) Ground reconnaissance including another round of serial reconnaissance for inaccessible and difficult stretches, where required.

Study of Survey Sheets and Maps:

Reconnaissance survey starts with a study of the all available maps. After study of the topographical features on the maps, a number of economical alignments feasible in a general way are selected keeping in view the following points:
(i) The alignment to take into account all the control points and to be shortened and more economical compatible with requirements of gradients and curvature.
(ii) Shape of the alignment.
(iii) Avoidance as far as possible of marshy ground, steep terrains, unstable hill features and areas subject to severe climatic conditions, flooding and inundation.
(iv) Need of connecting important villages and towns.
(v) Bridging problems, and
(vi) Need to preserve environment and maintain ecological balance.
The aerial photographs, if taken may be to a scale of 1:20000 to 1:50000 to supplement the information from topographic maps. If stereoscopic techniques are applied, aerial photographs can yield quantitative data, and if studied by a skilled photo interpreter, significant soil and subsoil information.

Aerial Reconnaissance Survey:

An aerial reconnaissance will provide a bird’s eye view of the alignments under consideration along with the surrounding area. It will help to identify factors which call for rejection or modification of any of the alignments. Final decision about the alignments to be studied in detail on the ground could be taken on the basis of the aerial reconnaissance.

Ground Reconnaissance Survey:

Ground reconnaissance consists of general examination of ground by walking or riding along the probable routes and collecting all available information necessary for evaluating the same. In the case of hill sections, it may be advantageous sometime to start the reconnaissance from an obligatory point situated close to the top. If an area is inaccessible for the purpose of ground reconnaissance, aerial method should be used to clear the doubts.
While reconnoitering on the ground, it is advisable to leave reference pegs to facilitate further survey operations.
Instruments generally used for ground reconnaissance include compass, Abney level / alti-meter, pedometer, aneroid barometer, clinometers, ghat tracer etc. Walkie-talkie sets are useful for communication, particularly in difficult terrain.
Use of instruments mentioned above to obtain ground slopes, maximum gradients, elevation of critical summits or stream crossings and location of obligatory points, serves as a check on the maps being used.

Reconnaissance Survey Reports:


Based on information collected during the reconnaissance survey, a report should be prepared. The report should include all relevant information collected during the survey and a plan to the scale of 1:50000 showing the alternative alignments studied along with their general profile and rough cost estimate. It should also discuss the merits and demerits of the different alternatives to help the selection of one or more alignments for detailed survey and investigation.

What Is Marine Surveying?

What Is Marine Surveying?
Marine surveying is the practice of inspecting marine equipment, primarily boats and cargo, to determine safety and market value. A marine surveyor may be called in to assess a damaged vessel for insurance purposes, appraise a vessel that is being sold, or even serve as an expert witness in court. Schools offering Engineering & Technology Management degrees can also be found in these popular choices.

Industry Overview
The marine surveying industry is comprised of independent, local marine surveying businesses and professional organizations, like the International Institute of Marine Surveying (IIMS) and the National Association of Marine Surveyors (NAMS Global). Through these businesses and organizations, marine surveyors provide expert advice regarding the safety and value of marine equipment ranging from private yachts to cargo vessels. They may also act as claims investigators for insurance companies or provide expert testimony in marine-related trials.
There are many types of marine surveying. Three common categories are:
Surveyors of small watercraft
Machinery and hull surveyors
Cargo surveyors
Important Facts about this Occupation
Median Pay
$88,030 (2014)
Job Outlook
10% growth in employment 2012-2022, average (all surveyors)
Work Environment
Fieldwork is common; may be required to stand or walk outside for long periods
Similar Occupations
Land Surveyors, Surveying and Mapping Technicians, Cartographers, Geophysical Prospecting Surveyors
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Yachts and Small Vessels
These marine surveyors typically deal with watercraft that are less than 300 feet long. They might conduct an appraisal for someone selling a used yacht or conduct an insurance investigation of a boating accident.
Machinery and Hulls
Marine surveyors who are experts in machinery and hulls inspect industrial equipment like commercial ships, cranes, and barges. They assess the safety and market value of commercial and private vessels that are longer than 300 feet.
Cargo
Marine surveyors who specialize in cargo are experts in assessing cargo transportation methods and damage. Cargo surveyors may be knowledgeable about various types of cargo, including rail, air, and marine.
Education and Training
If you'd like to learn more about the subject of marine surveying, or if you're thinking about becoming a marine surveyor, these educational options might interest you:
The Maritime College at the State University of New York offers certificates in various marine surveying topics, some of which are available via distance learning

The IIMS offers a handful of marine surveying courses

Tuesday 21 June 2016

BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL AND CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY

BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL AND CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY
What is bearing capacity of Soil?
The bearing capacity of soil is defined as the capacity of the soil to bear the loads coming from the foundation. The pressure which the soil can easily withstand against load is called allowable bearing pressure.

Following are some types of bearing capacity of soil:

Ultimate bearing capacity of soil (qu)

The gross pressure at the base of the foundation at which soil fails is called ultimate bearing capacity.

Net ultimate bearing capacity (qnu)

By neglecting the overburden pressure from ultimate bearing capacity we will get net ultimate bearing capacity.
image
Where gamma= unit weight of soil, Df = depth of foundation

Net safe bearing capacity of soil (qns)

By considering only shear failure, net ultimate bearing capacity is divided by certain factor of safety will give the net safe bearing capacity.
qns = qnu/ F
Where F = factor of safety = 3 (usual value)

Gross safe bearing capacity (qs)

When ultimate bearing capacity is divided by factor of safety it will give gross safe bearing capacity.
qs = qu/F

Net safe settlement pressure (qnp)

The pressure with which the soil can carry without exceeding the allowable settlement is called net safe settlement pressure.

Net allowable bearing pressure (qna)

This is the pressure we can used for the design of foundations. This is equal to net safe bearing pressure if qnp > qns. In the reverse case it is equal to net safe settlement pressure.

How to Calculate Bearing Capacity of Soil?

Calculation of bearing capacity of soil:

For the calculation of bearing capacity of soil, there are so many theories. But all the theories are superseded by Terzaghi’s bearing capacity theory.

Terzaghi’s bearing capacity theory

Terzaghi’s bearing capacity theory is useful to determine the bearing capacity of soils under a strip footing. This theory is only applicable to shallow foundations. He considered some assumptions which are as follows.
1.   The base of the strip footing is rough.
2.   The depth of footing is less than or equal to its breadth i.e., shallow footing.
3.   He neglected the shear strength of soil above the base of footing and replaced it with uniform surcharge. ( gamma symbolDf)
4.   The load acting on the footing is uniformly distributed and is acting in vertical direction.
5.   He assumed that the length of the footing is infinite.
6.   He considered Mohr-coulomb equation as a governing factor for the shear strength of soil.
As shown in above figure, AB is base of the footing. He divided the shear zones into 3 categories. Zone -1 (ABC) which is under the base is acts as if it were a part of the footing itself. Zone -2 (CAF and CBD) acts as radial shear zones which is bear by the sloping edges AC and BC. Zone -3 (AFG and BDE) is named as Rankine’s passive zones which are taking surcharge (y Df) coming from its top layer of soil.

From the equation of equilibrium,
Downward forces = upward forces
Load from footing x weight of wedge = passive pressure + cohesion x CB sinimage
Bearing capacity of soil calculation - Terzaghi's Formula
Where Pp = resultant passive pressure = (Pp)y + (Pp)c + (Pp)q
(Pp)y is derived by considering weight of wedge BCDE and by making cohesion and surcharge zero.
(Pp)c is derived by considering cohesion and by neglecting weight and surcharge.
(Pp)q is derived by considering surcharge and by neglecting weight and cohesion.
Therefore,

By substituting,


So, finally we get qu = c’Nc + y Df Nq + 0.5 y B Ny
The above equation is called as Terzaghi’s bearing capacity equation. Where qu is the ultimate bearing capacity and Nc, Nq, Ny are the Terzaghi’s bearing capacity factors. These dimensionless factors are dependents of angle of shearing resistance ().
Equations to find the bearing capacity factors are:




Where

Kp = coefficient of passive earth pressure.
For different values of image, bearing capacity factors under general shear failure are arranged in the below table.
ø
Nc
Nq
Ny
0
5.7
1
0
5
7.3
1.6
0.5
10
9.6
2.7
1.2
15
12.9
4.4
2.5
20
17.7
7.4
5
25
25.1
12.7
9.7
30
37.2
22.5
19.7
35
57.8
41.4
42.4
40
95.7
81.3
100.4
45
172.3
173.3
297.5
50
347.5
415.1
1153.2

Finally, to determine bearing capacity under strip footing we can use

qu = c’Nc + imageDf Nq + 0.5 image B Ny

By the modification of above equation, equations for square and circular footings are also given and they are.
For square footing
qu = 1.2 c’Nc + image Df Nq + 0.4 image B Ny
For circular footing
qu = 1.2 c’Nc +imageDf Nq + 0.3image B Ny

Hansen’s bearing capacity theory

For cohesive soils, Values obtained by Terzaghi’s bearing capacity theory are more than the experimental values. But however it is showing same values for cohesion less soils. So Hansen modified the equation by considering shape, depth and inclination factors.
According to Hansen’s
qu = c’Nc Sc dc ic + image Df Nq Sq dq iq + 0.5 image B Ny Sy dy iy
Where Nc, Nq, Ny = Hansen’s bearing capacity factors
Sc, Sq, Sy = shape factors
dc, dq, dy = depth factors
ic, iq, iy = inclination factors
Bearing capacity factors are calculated by following equations.





For different values of image Hansen bearing capacity factors are calculated in the below table.

imageø
Nc
Nq
Ny
0
5.14
1
0
5
6.48
1.57
0.09
10
8.34
2.47
0.09
15
10.97
3.94
1.42
20
14.83
6.4
3.54
25
20.72
10.66
8.11
30
30.14
18.40
18.08
35
46.13
33.29
40.69
40
75.32
64.18
95.41
45
133.89
134.85
240.85
50
266.89
318.96
681.84

Shape factors for different shapes of footing are given in below table.

Shape of footing
Sc
Sq
Sy
Continuous
1
1
1
Rectangular
1+0.2B/L
1+0.2B/L
1-0.4B/L
Square
1.3
1.2
0.8
Circular
1.3
1.2
0.6
Depth factors are considered according to the following table.

Depth factors
Values
dc
1+0.35(D/B)
dq
1+0.35(D/B)
dy
1.0
Similarly inclination factors are considered from below table.
Inclination factors
Values
ic
1 – [H/(2 c B L)]
iq
1 – 1.5 (H/V)
iy
(iq)2
Where H = horizontal component of inclined load
B = width of footing
L = length of footing.